Clinical Validation for Cardiology Imaging
Real-world performance data and clinical validation of SoftDicom portable PACS for cath lab software and cardiology imaging workflows.
Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark Methodology
Test Environment
- • Intel i7-12700K processor
- • 32GB DDR4 RAM
- • NVMe SSD configuration
- • 512×512 JPEG 2000 images
Comparison Baseline
- • Traditional PACS workstations
- • Desktop DICOM viewers
- • Web-based viewers
- • 1000+ image test sets
Clinical Validation
Interventional Cardiology Pilot Study
Objective
Evaluate SoftDicom's impact on procedure preparation time and image review efficiency in cardiac catheterization lab.
Method
30-day pilot with 12 interventional cardiologists, comparing traditional PACS vs SoftDicom for pre-procedure planning.
Results
- • 47% reduction in image loading time
- • 23% faster procedure preparation
- • 100% clinician satisfaction score
"SoftDicom has transformed our workflow. Having instant access to patient images anywhere in the hospital, without waiting for IT setup, is game-changing for emergency procedures."Dr. Sarah Chen, MD
Interventional Cardiologist
Usage Statistics
Calculate Your ROI
ROI Calculator
Calculate your potential time and cost savings with SoftDicom
Assumptions: Calculations based on time savings from faster image loading, reduced setup time at the bedside, and elimination of clinician wait for IT provisioning. Actual savings may vary based on workflow and usage patterns.
Experience the Difference
Join 200+ physicians using SoftDicom for cath lab and cardiology imaging workflows.
† Performance based on 512×512 JPEG 2000 images on Intel i7 processor.
‡ Load times vary based on image size and system configuration.
◊ Reliability statistics based on 12 months of field testing across pilot sites.